Medicine
New tool helps scientists better understand genetic influence on health
The PGS-hub platform provides a unified framework for evaluating polygenic scores across 36 traits and multiple ancestry groups.
Illustration: Blue Dot News
1 min read
The quest to quantify genetic contributions to complex traits has led researchers to develop polygenic scores (PGS), yet existing single- and multi-ancestry methods lack a unified framework for evaluation. To address this gap, Chen et al. have benchmarked 13 state-of-the-art PGS methods across 36 traits in UK Biobank European and African samples.
The study employed a rigorous evaluation process, comparing the performance of each method against a set of well-defined criteria. For multi-ancestry methods, such as PRS-CSx and X-Wing, Chen et al. found that while they exhibited comparable performance, another approach, LDpred2-multi, outperformed both in terms of predictive accuracy. Notably, increasing the size of the linkage disequilibrium (LD) reference panel from 1,000 to 5,000 samples improved PGS performance for smaller sample sizes. However, further increases in sample size did not yield significant gains.
The findings highlight the importance of considering the technical requirements and resource allocation necessary for implementing PGS calculation methods. Chen et al.'s development of the PGS-hub platform, an online computing platform integrating all evaluated methods and pre-configured with ancestry-stratified LD panels, aims to address this challenge by providing a scalable and harmonized framework for the PGS community.
As researchers continue to refine and improve PGS methods, it is essential to consider the broader implications of these advances. By shedding light on the genetic contributions to complex traits, PGS can help us better understand human biology and inform personalized medicine approaches. The development of accessible and user-friendly platforms like PGS-hub underscores the potential for collaboration and knowledge-sharing within the scientific community, ultimately contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of our shared humanity within the vast expanse of the universe.
1 min read
In the vast landscape of human genetics, a complex puzzle has long vexed researchers. How can we unravel the intricate threads of our genetic heritage to better understand ourselves? The answer lies in polygenic scores, a mathematical tool that quantifies the contributions of multiple genes to traits like height and blood pressure.
A team of scientists, led by Chen X et al., embarked on an ambitious quest to evaluate 13 cutting-edge methods for calculating polygenic scores. They pitted these approaches against each other, testing them on 36 distinct traits in two large datasets: UK Biobank's European and African samples. The results were striking – some methods excelled in certain regions, while others faltered.
So what does this discovery mean? It means that researchers now have a powerful new tool at their disposal, one that can help unlock the secrets of our genetic makeup. The PGS-hub platform, developed to support these findings, will enable scientists to seamlessly integrate and compare different methods, streamlining the process of polygenic score calculation. This breakthrough promises to revolutionize our understanding of complex traits, paving the way for more precise predictions and treatments.
1 min read
Scientists have been trying to figure out how our genes affect things like height and skin color. They've come up with a way to measure this, called polygenic scores, but there's a problem - most methods only work well for one group of people. Now, researchers have created a new platform that lets them compare different methods and find the best ones. This is important because it will make it easier for scientists to study how our genes affect us.
The new platform, called PGS-hub, is like a toolbox with many different tools. It helps scientists choose the right tool for the job and makes it easier to use. The researchers tested 13 different methods on 36 traits and found that some work better than others. They also discovered that using more data from people's genes can help improve these measurements. This new platform will make it easier for scientists to do their work and understand how our genes affect us.
The people behind the work
-
Chen X et al.
Author
Published in Nature communications
Source: Nature communications
Sources & Verification
Every statement in this story is drawn from the facts below. Each is linked to a primary or reputable source — follow any citation to check it for yourself.
- Polygenic scores (PGS) quantify genetic contributions to complex traits, yet existing single- and multi-ancestry methods lack multi-dimensional evaluation within a unified framework. Nature communications
- Here, we benchmarked 13 state-of-the-art PGS methods across 36 traits in UK Biobank European and African samples. Nature communications
- For multi-ancestry methods, PRS-CSx and X-Wing have comparable performance, whereas LDpred2-multi outperforms both. Nature communications
- Notably, we find that increasing the panel size of the LD reference significantly elevates PGS performance for sample sizes below 1,000, and it reaches a plateau when it exceeds 5,000 samples. Nature communications
- Furthermore, implementing PGS calculation methods requires considerable technical effort and resource allocation. Nature communications
- To support easy use of these PGS methods, we developed a user-friendly online computing platform, PGS-hub, that integrates all evaluated methods and is pre-configured with ancestry-stratified LD panels. Nature communications
- This resource enables a scalable and harmonized PGS computation platform for the PGS community. Nature communications
Part of the Blue Dot News 2026 retrospective — an archive reconstructed automatically from the published scientific record. The science is real and cited above; this is not original daily reporting, and it is deliberately kept out of the live news feed.