Chemistry
New study explores how water helps clean up toxic pesticides from drinking water
Researchers found that a key process called hydration plays a significant role in removing glyphosate and another toxic chemical from membranes used for water purification.
Illustration: Blue Dot News
1 min read
The role of hydration in the removal of glyphosate (GLY) and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) by nanofiltration membranes is an area that has garnered significant attention in recent studies. Researchers Trinh PB et al. have investigated the properties of hydration and its impact on GLY/AMPA removal.
The study reveals that charge and dielectric exclusions are dominant in membranes with molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) greater than 150 Da. This is evident when GLY and AMPA in neutral forms are partially removed, with removal rates ranging from 50-80% at pH 2. However, when GLY/AMPA are negatively charged, the removal rate increases significantly, indicating the growing contribution of both charge and dielectric exclusions.
Further analysis shows that the hydration layer can be shredded at higher applied pressures, leading to a decrease in removal efficiency. Specifically, when the applied pressure is increased from 86% to 28%, and from 27% to 7% for GLY and AMPA respectively. This suggests that the presence of a hydrated layer plays a crucial role in the removal process.
The findings of this study have important implications for tuning nanofiltration membranes for water purification. By understanding the role of hydration in removing small and charged organic micropollutants, researchers can develop more effective strategies for improving membrane performance. This research serves as a reminder that even at the molecular level, the universe is governed by the same fundamental principles of physics and chemistry that shape our everyday experiences.
1 min read
In a world where our drinking water can be contaminated with toxic chemicals like glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid, scientists are racing to develop more efficient ways to remove them. Researchers Trinh PB and his team have made a breakthrough in understanding how nanofiltration membranes work to clean polluted water. They found that these tiny filters use a combination of steric, Donnan, and dielectric exclusions to trap the pollutants. But what's really important is the role of hydration – the layer of water molecules surrounding the pollutants.
Imagine a thin film of water molecules clinging to glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid, like a protective shield. At first, this hydration layer seems like just a minor obstacle for the nanofiltration membrane to overcome. But as researchers applied higher pressures, they watched in amazement as the hydration layer began to break down. This allowed more of the pollutants to pass through – but also revealed that the true power of these membranes lies not just in their physical properties, but in how they interact with the water molecules themselves.
So why does this matter? The ability to tune nanofiltration membranes for optimal performance could be a game-changer for communities around the world struggling to access clean drinking water. By understanding the role of hydration in removing these toxic pollutants, researchers can design membranes that are more efficient and effective – paving the way for safer, healthier water for all.
1 min read
Nanofiltration, which filters tiny particles from water, works by using special properties of its walls to trap pollutants like glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid. But what makes it work? Researchers wanted to know how hydration - the layer of water molecules that surrounds these pollutants - plays a role.
In their study, the team found that when the pH level was low or acidic, the water layer around the pollutants made them easier to remove from the water. As the pH level went up, this "water shield" grew stronger and helped to trap more of the pollutants. The researchers used special tools like molecular dynamics simulations and infrared spectroscopy to see how the water molecules interacted with these pollutants. They discovered that even when the applied pressure was high, the water layer around the pollutants could still be disrupted, allowing some of them to escape. This finding is important for developing more effective filters for cleaning contaminated water.
The people behind the work
-
Trinh PB et al.
Author
Published in Nature communications
Source: Nature communications
Sources & Verification
Every statement in this story is drawn from the facts below. Each is linked to a primary or reputable source — follow any citation to check it for yourself.
- Nanofiltration can remove glyphosate (GLY) and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) from water via steric, Donnan, and dielectric exclusions, although the significance of dielectric exclusion resulting from hydration has not been elucidated. Nature communications
- This study investigates the properties of hydration and its role in GLY/AMPA removal. show that charge and dielectric exclusions are dominant in membranes with molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) > 150 Da. Nature communications
- The contribution of dielectric exclusion is evident when GLY and AMPA in neutral forms are partially removed (50-80%) with >150 Da membranes at pH 2. Nature communications
- When GLY/AMPA are negatively charged (pH from 4 to 12), GLY/AMPA removal increased from 50-80 to 90%, indicating the growing contribution of both charge and dielectric exclusions. Nature communications
- The hydration layer can be shredded at higher applied pressures, decreasing removal from 86 to 28% (GLY) and 27 to 7% (AMPA). Nature communications
- Both molecular dynamics and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) agree on the strong hydration of GLY/AMPA especially at pH 4-6. Nature communications
- Understanding the role of hydration in the removal of small and charged organic micropollutants is important for tuning NF membranes for water purification. Nature communications
Part of the Blue Dot News 2026 retrospective — an archive reconstructed automatically from the published scientific record. The science is real and cited above; this is not original daily reporting, and it is deliberately kept out of the live news feed.